🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a misguided assessment of Europe. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "woke" policies represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument is based on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The actual challenge confronting the EU is not cultural but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Growth Divide Between Europe and the US

Statistics paint a stark contrast. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by 87%, compared to a mere 13.5% growth for the European Union. During this period, European income per person fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than major European economies like Italy and France.

Today, roughly half of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Question

This widening disparity is driven by superior productivity growth in the US, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last fifty years, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at over $10bn, versus just 14 in Europe.

This disparity raises a vital question: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is the EU stand? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations entering at a significant handicap.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

A number of major reasons explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a much more robust and agile network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, which limits the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided rules hamper European business. A US startup can introduce a service under a single regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a bigger population size, is divided among twenty-seven different national regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In parts of Europe, business failure was once viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's long-term lack of spending in defense has eroded its capacity for pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find causes for optimism. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to propose serious reform. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the need for major changes.

With the right policies and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable far greater levels of commercial innovation.

The continent retains significant strengths: skilled workforce, excellent education systems, and premier labs. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if Europe does not become the leader in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a critical moment. As the saying goes, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. However, without bold steps to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in world influence.